Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  470 / 540 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 470 / 540 Next Page
Page Background

СОВРЕМЕННОЕ СОСТОЯНИЕ УПРАВЛЕНИЯ ГЕНЕТИЧЕСКИМИ РЕСУРСАМИ ЖИВОТНЫХ

441

literature.

SGRP/IFPRI/ILRI. (available at http://

www.ilri.org/)

.

FAO.

2003.

Community-based management of animal

genetic resources.

Proceedings of the workshop

held in Mbabane, Swaziland, 7–11 May 2001. FAO/

SADC/UNDP/GTZ/CTA. Rome.

Gibson, J.P. & Pullin, R.S.V.

2005.

Conservation of

livestock and fish genetic resources.

Rome. CGIAR

Science Council Secretariat.

Gollin, D & Evenson, R.

2003. Valuing animal genetic

resources: lessons from plant genetic resources.

Ecological Economics,

45(3): 353–363.

ILRI.

1999.

Economic valuation of animal genetic

resources.

Proceedings of an FAO/ILRI workshop

held at FAO Headquarters, Rome, Italy, 15–17

March 1999. Nairobi. International Livestock

Research Institute.

Jabbar, M.A. & Diedhiou, M.L.

2003. Does breed matter

to cattle farmers and buyers? Evidence from West

Africa.

Ecological Economics,

45(3): 461–472.

Jabbar, M.A., Swallow, B.M., d’Ieteren, G.D.M. &

Busari, A.A.

1998. Farmer preferences and market

values of cattle breeds of west and central Africa.

Journal of Sustainable Agriculture,

12: 21–47.

Jahnke, H.E.

1982.

Livestock production systems and

livestock development in Tropical Africa.

Kiel,

Germany. Kieler Wissenschaftsverlag Vauk.

Karugia, J., Mwai, O., Kaitho, R., Drucker, A., Wollny,

C. & Rege, J.E.O.

2001. Economic analysis of

crossbreeding programmes in sub-Saharan Africa:

a conceptual framework and Kenyan case study.

Animal Genetic Resources Research 2

. Nairobi.

International Livestock Research Institute.

Mendelsohn, R.

2003. The challenge of conserving

indigenous domesticated animals.

Ecological

Economics,

45(3): 501–510.

Meng, E.C.H.

1997.

Land allocation decisions and

in situ conservation of crop genetic resources: The

case of wheat landraces in Turkey.

University of

California, Davis, California, USA. (PhD thesis)

Mitchell, G., Smith, C., Makower, M. & Bird, P.J.W.N.

1982. An economic appraisal of pig improvement

in Great Britain. 1. Genetic and production aspects.

Animal Production

, 35(2): 215–224.

Ollivier, L. & Foulley, J.

2005. Aggregate diversity:

new approach combining within- and between-

breed diversity.

Livestock Production Science,

95(3):

247-254.

Pattison, J.

2002.

Characterising backyard pig

keeping households of rural Mexico and their

willingness to accept compensation for maintaining

the indigenous Creole breed: A Study of Incentive

Measures and Conservation Options.

University of

London. (MSc thesis).

Pearce, D. & Moran, D.

1994.

The economic value

of biodiversity.

London. Earthscan.

Rege, J.E.O. & Gibson, J.P.

2003. Animal genetic

resources and economic development: issues

in relation to economic valuation.

Ecological

Economics,

45(3): 319-330.

Reist-Marti, S., Simianer, H., Gibson, G., Hanotte, O.

& Rege, J.E.O.

2003. Weitzman’s approach and

breed diversity conservation: an application to

African cattle breeds.

Conservation Biology,

17(5):

1299–1311.

Richards, T. & Jeffrey, S.

1995.

Hedonic pricing of

dairy bulls – an alternative index of genetic merit.

Department of Rural Economy. Project Report

95–04. Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry, and Home

Economics. Edmonton, Canada. University of

Alberta Edmonton.

Roosen, J., Fadlaoui, A. & Bertaglia. M.

2005.

Economic evaluation for conservation of farm

animal genetic resources.

Journal of Animal

Breeding and Genetics,

122(4): 217–228.

Scarpa, R., Drucker, A.G., Anderson, S., Ferraes-Ehuan,

N., Gómez, V., Risopatrón, C.R. & Rubio-Leonel,

O.

2003a. Valuing genetic resources in peasant

economies: the case of 'hairless' Creole pigs in

Yucatan.

Ecological Economics,

45(3): 427-443.

Scarpa, R., Ruto, E.S.K., Kristjanson, P., Radeny, M.,

Drucker, A.G. & Rege, J.E.O.

2003b. Valuing

indigenous cattle breeds in Kenya: an empirical

comparison of stated and revealed preference value

estimates.

Ecological Economics,

45(3): 409–426.