

СОСТОЯНИЕ ВСЕМИРНЫХ ГЕНЕТИЧЕСКИХ РЕСУРСОВ ЖИВОТНЫХ
В СФЕРЕ ПРОДОВОЛЬСТВИЯ И СЕЛЬСКОГО ХОЗЯЙСТВА
РАЗДЕЛ
1
100
популяций, как специализированных, так и много-
функциональных. Однако решения, принимаемые
в сфере управления ГРЖ, часто не учитывают
все то разнообразие функций, которые выполня-
ют животные в современном мире. Особенно это
относится к нематериальной сфере, значимость
которой очень сложно измерить и оценить. При
сохранении такой точки зрения существует реаль-
ная опасность игнорирования важности местных
многофункциональных пород, что может привести
к существенному обеднению многогранности че-
ловеческого бытия во всем мире.
Источники
Arya, H.P.S., Yadav, M.P. & Tiwari, R.
2002.
Livestock technologies for small farm systems.
In
P.S. Birthal & P.P. Rao, eds.
Technology options
for sustainable livestock production in India.
Proceedings of the Workshop on Documentation,
Adoption, and Impact of Livestock Technologies in
India, 18–19 Jan 2001, ICRISAT-Patancheru, India,
pp. 8–89. New Delhi/Patancheru, India. National
Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy
Research/ International Crops Research Institute
for the Semi-Arid Tropics.
Bodó, I.
2005.
From a bottle neck up to the commercial
option.
Paper presented at the 4th World Italian
Beef Cattle Congress, Gubbio, Italy, 29 April
29 – 1 May 1, 2005. (available at http://www.
anabic.it/congresso2005/atti/lavori/023%20def_Bod%C3%B2_st.pdf).
CR (Country name).
Year.
Country report on the state
of animal genetic resources.
(available in DAD-IS
library at
http://www.fao.org/dad-is/).
Dorward, A.R., Anderson, S., Paz, R., Pattison, J.,
Sanchez Vera, E., Nava, Y. & Rushton, J.
2004.
A guide to indicators and methods for
assessing the contribution of livestock keeping
to the livelihoods of the poor.
London. DFID.
(also available at
http://www.ilri.cgiar.org/html/Guide16Dec.pdf).
FAO.
2002.
Improved animal health and poverty reduction
for rural livelihoods.
Animal Production and Health
Paper, No. 153. Rome.
FAO.
2003a.
The yak
. Second edition revised and enlarged
by G. Wiener, H. Jianlin, & L. Ruijun. Bangkok. FAO
Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific.
FAO.
2003b.
World agriculture towards 2015/2030. An FAO
perspective.
Edited by J. Bruinsma. London. Earthscan.
FAOSTAT.
(available at
http://faostat.fao.org/).
Hungarian Grey Workshop.
2000.
The origins of the
Hungarian Grey cattle.
Proceedings of a workshop held
in Bugacpuszta, Hungary, 23–24 November 2000.
IFAD.
2004.
Livestock services and the poor. A global
initiative. Collecting, coordinating and sharing
information.
Rome. International Fund for
Agricultural Development.
Riethmuller, P.
2003. The social impact of livestock:
a developing country perspective.
Animal Science
Journal,
74(4): 245–253.
Sarkar, A.B.
2001. Strategies for development of animal
husbandry in Assam.
In
B.C. Barah, ed.
Prioritisation
of strategies for agricultural development in
Northeastern India.
Proceedings 9, pp. 29–33. New
Delhi. National Center for Agricultural Economics and
Policy Research (ICAR).
Schiere, J.B.
1995.
Cattle, straw and system control.
Amsterdam. Koninklijk Institute voor de Tropen.
Thornton, P.K., Kruska, R.L., Henninger, N., Kristjanson, P.M.,
Reid, R.S., Atieno, F., Odero, A.N. &Ndegwa, T. 2002.
Mapping poverty and livestock in the developing world.
Nairobi. International Livestock Research Institute. (also
available at
http://www.ilri.cgiar.org/InfoServ/Webpub/fulldocs/mappingPLDW/index.htm).
UNDP.
1995.
The human development report 1995:
gender and human development.
New York.
United Nations Development Programme.