ЭлБиб

416 / 522

also accelerates process o f flowering, that leads to increase number of
pods/plsnt in comparison with the control (on 36 %). Cultivars Sonata,
Garmonya, SibNIIK-315 and Line 52-M had a similar results.
Table 1
Influence of growth stimulation treatment on dynamics of plant
growth and development for variety Mageva (2005)
Age,
days
Cul- I Plant
tivar 1 height,
I cm
% to
contr.
Bran­
ches,
No.
% to
contr.
Lea­
ves,
No.
%
to
cont
rol
Pods,
No.
%to 1
con-
trol
Pre-planting treatments “on seeds” 1
35
Con­
trol
5.7±
0.15 100 - - 3.4±
0.09 100 - -
Albit 8.4±
0.20
147.
4 -- - 4.4±
0.15
129.
4 -- -
50
Con­
trol
21.1±
0.8 100 2.0±0.08 100 4.5±0.15 100 - -
" “ 1 Й 8±
112.
8
2.4±
0.08 120.0 5.4±0.20
120.
0 - --
After-planting treatments in flowering stage
65
1Con­
trol
25.0±
1.2 100 2.2+0.08 100 12.0±0.6 100 14.0±1.1 100
Albit 32.0±
3.1
128.
0
2.5±
0.09 113.6 20.0±0.7
166.
7
19.1±
1.2
136.
4
80
I Con­
trol ;
55.0±
4.1 100 3.9±0.21 100 28.0±0.7 100 41.0±1.4 100
Albit 60.0+
4.1
109.
1
4.2±
0.24 107.7 33.0±0.9
117.
9
52.0±
1.4
126.
8
105
Con-
1tro*
35.0±
1.9 100 3.3±0.24 100 18.0±0.7 100 36.0±1.5 100
I Albit 32.0±
1.4 91.4 3.5±0.18 106.1 21.0±1.1
ii6 .
7
46.0±
2.0
127.
8
The effect o f growth stimulation processes and efficiency though is
found out in plants of all investigated cultivars, however, not in an equal
measure. Thus the range of stimulation changes in limits from 1 0 to 60
% depending on a parameter. High increase of all investigated parame­
ters observed at 35-days after planting day and in two weeks after
410
Научная электронная библиотека ЦНСХБ