ЭлБиб

Аграрная наука Евро-Северо-Востока, №6(61), 2017 г.

Features of formation and realization of the economic interests in agriculture

Vorobyov S.Р.

PhD in economics, associate professor,

Gritsenko G.М.

DSc in economics, professor, head of laboratory,

Vorobyova V.V.

PhD in economics, associate professor

Altai State University, Barnaul, Russia

Siberian Federal Scientific Centre of Agro-Biotechnologies of The Russian Academy of Sciences,

Novosibirsk, Russia

The economic interests of business entities in agriculture are constantly being transformed, becoming more

complicated when external and internal factors and conditions change. It predetermines the urgency of their additional

identification and classification. The duality of interests of various business agricultural entities is noted depending

on their role in this or that social group. The duality of interests is determined not only by property relations, but also

by the level of corporate social responsibility of agricultural organizations, the expectations of the local community,

the place of permanent residence of direct participants of agricultural production. The system of classification of fea-

tures of economic interests is supplemented by the signs allowing taking into account the sphere of employment and

sources of the main income of stakeholders, their place of residence, expectations from participation in agricultural

production. Economic interests are grouped for the main groups of interest: employees of the organization, manage-

ment personnel of the organization, owners of land/capital, the state in the person of government bodies, society - their

inconsistency is found out. Macroeconomic results of the violation of the parity of interests of the main stakeholders

in agriculture are the hidden employment of some rural residents, the removal of a part of the gross added value from

the legal turnover. The resolution of contradictions depends on the policy of intraeconomic relations carried out by

the heads of agricultural enterprises (owners). In general, managers of agricultural enterprises are not only interme-

diaries in the organizational process of relations of economic interests carriers, but also by their active participants.

The main conditions for more fully satisfying the personal, collective and public interests of the main stakeholders

are identified in the article: attracting and retaining highly skilled workers, matching the growth of productivity and

wages, improving the quality of products, reducing the disparity of prices among partners in the agribusiness system,

improving relationships with financial institutions, improvement of the state’s social policy within the framework of

sustainable development of rural areas.

Key words

economic

interest, conflict of interests, property, transformation, agriculture, economic relations

References

1. Belkina N.A., Slav P.A.

Klassifikatsiya eko-

nomicheskikh interesov.

[Classification of economic

interests].

Vestnik Yuzhno-ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo

universiteta. Seriya: ekonomika i menedzhment

. 2011.

no. 28. pp. 58-66.

2. Bundina O.I., Bozhchenko Zh.A.

Osobennosti

realizatsii ekonomicheskikh interesov v agrarnom sek-

tore ekonomiki

. [Features of Realization of Economic

Interests in Agriculture].

Ekonomika, trud, upravlenie v

sel’skom khozyaystve

. 2014. no. 3. pp. 61-64.

3. Kolobova A.I., Musienko D.V.

Zemel’nye

otnosheniya – osnova povysheniya effektivnosti agrar-

nogo proizvodstva

. [Land relations as the foundation of

increase in agricultural production effectiveness].

Vest-

nik Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universi-

teta.

2009. no. 11. pp. 81-86.

4. Batishchev D.G.

Protivorechiya v sisteme eko-

nomicheskikh interesov sub”ektov rynochnykh otnosh-

eniy.

[Contradictions in system of economic interests of

subjects of market relations].

Terra economicus

. 2009.

Vol. 7. no. 4-2. pp. 20-22.

5. Freeman R.E. Strategic Management: A

Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman Books Limited,

1984. 276 p.

Osnovnye polozheniya korennoy perestroyki

upravleniya ekonomikoy

. [Substantive provisions of

radical reorganisation of management of economy].

Moscow:

Politizdat

, 1987. 112 p.

7. Belousov V.M.

Sistema formirovaniya i re-

alizatsii ekonomicheskikh interesov sel’skokhozyayst-

vennykh tovaroproizvoditeley

. [The System of forma-

tion and realization of the economic interests of farm

commodity producers].

Izvestiya Orenburgskogo go-

sudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta

. 2013. no. 6.

pp. 167-170.

8. Avdeev I.M.

K voprosu o sushchnosti ekono-

micheskogo interesa

. [About the essence of economic

interest].

Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskie yavleniya i prot-

sessy

. 2009. no. 1. pp. 18-20.

9. Bogoviz A.V., Vorob’ev S.P., Vorob’eva V.V.

Vliyanie organizatsionno-pravovoy formy sel’skok-

hozyaystvennykh organizatsiy na effektivnost’ ikh funkt-

sionirovaniya.

[Influence of an organizational legal

form of the agricultural organizations on efficiency of

their functioning].

Ekonomika sel’skogo khozyaystva

Rossii

. 2017. no. 3. pp. 18-23.

10. Meshcheryakova E.N.

Sistema ekonomi-

cheskikh interesov proizvodstvennoy gruppy

. [Sys-

tem of economic interests of industrial group].

Sot-

sial’no-ekonomicheskie yavleniya i protsessy

. 2011.

no. 7. pp. 133-138.

11. Balashov A.P.

Rukovoditel’ sel’skokhozyayst-

vennoy organizatsii kak osobaya professiya

. [Head of

agricultural organization as a special profession].

APK:

ekonomika, upravlenie

. 2017. no. 1. pp. 28-33.

Электронная Научная СельскоХозяйственная Библиотека