Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  41 / 52 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 41 / 52 Next Page
Page Background

ГЕНЕТИКА, БИОТЕХНОЛОГИЯ, СЕЛЕКЦИЯ И СЕМЕНОВОДСТВО

www.kormoproizvodstvo.ru

ͪКормопроизводствоͫ № 1, 2017

39

10. Суходолец В. В. Функция кроссинговера / В. В. Суходолец // Генетика. — 1986. — Т. 22. —№ 11. — С.2551–2559.

11. Седловский А. И. Изучение нетрадиционных методов селекции самоопыляющихся культур / А. И. Седловский, Л. Н. Тюпина, В. В. Новоха-

тин // Проблемы теории и прикладной генетики в Казахстане: матер. Респ. конфер. — Алма-Ата, 1990. — С.4–5.

12. Сюков В. В. Методы подбора родительских пар для гибридизации у самоопыляющихся растений / В. В. Сюков. — Самара, 2007. — 80 с.

13. Цильке Р. А. Проблемы рекомбинационной селекции растений / Р. А. Цильке. — Новосибирск, 1989. — С.12–17.

14. Чекалин Н. М. Основные направления селекции зернобобовых культур / Н. М. Чекалин // Сельскохозяйственная биология. — 1979. —

Т. 14. —№ 6. — С.695–703.

15. Ebmeyer E. Heterosis and genetic variances and their implications for breeding improved varieties of spring beans (

Vicia faba

) / E. Ebmeyer //

Plant breed. — 1988. —Vol. 101. — No. 3. — P.200–207.

16. Habgood B. M. Estimation of genetic aiversity of selffertilising cereal cultivars basea on genotype — environment interactions / B. M. Habgood //

Euphytica. — 1977. —Vol. 26. — P.485–489.

17. Thurling N. Evaluation of parent selectionmethods for yield improvement of compea (

Vigna unguiculata

) / N. Thurling, M. Ratinam // Euphytica. —

1987. —Vol. 36. — No. 3. — P.913–926.

References

1. Ali-Zade A. V. Transgressii po elementam produktivnosti u gibridov tverdoy pshenitsy / A. V. Ali-Zade, V. G. Khalilov // Vestnik selskokhozyaystven-

noy nauki. — 1990. — No. 2. — P.55–59.

2. Akulinichev V. F. Biokhimicheskiy metod podbora par dlya skreshchivaniy / V. F. Akulinichev, S. N. Petukhov // Selektsiya i semenovodstvo. —

1998. — No. 3. — P.24.

3. Boroevich S. Printsipy i metody selektsii rasteniy / S. Boroevich. —Moscow: Kolos, 1984. — P.101–108.

4. Engalychev O. Kh. Introgressivnaya gibridizatsiya v selektsii rasteniy / O. Kh. Engalychev, A. I. Nuritdinov, N. S. Bakuras // Vestnik selskokhozyayst-

vennoy nauki. — 1987. — No. 5. — P.81–86.

5. Zhuchenko A. A. Problemy adaptatsii v sovremennom selskom khozyaystve / A. A. Zhuchenko // Selskokhozyaystvennaya biologiya. — 1993. —

No. 5. — P.3–35.

6. Ivshin G. I. Selektsiya posevnoy yarovoy viki i kormovykh bobov v usloviyakh Tsentralnykh rayonov Nechernozemnoy zony Rossii: avtoref. dis. …

d-ra s.-kh. nauk: 06.01.05. —Moscow, 2004. — 57 p.

7. Prognozirovanie selektsionnoy tsennosti gibridnykh populyatsiy yarovoy pshenitsy v rannikh pokoleniyakh / Yu. B. Konovalov, I. M. Kolesnikov,

V. A. Loshakova. —Moscow, 1987. — P.19–25.

8. Nettevich E. D. Povyshenie effektivnosti otbora yarovoy pshenitsy na stabilnost urozhaynosti i kachestvo zerna / E. D. Nettevich, A. I. Morgunov,

M. I. Maksimenko // Vestnik selskokhozyaystvennoy nauki. — 1985. — No. 1. — P.66–73.

9. Nuritdinov A. I. Nekotorye geneticheskie aspekty selektsii samoopylyayushchikhsya i perekrestnoopylyayushchikhsya kulur / A. I. Nuritdinov,

O. Kh. Engalychev // Vestnik selskokhozyaystvennoy nauki. — 1986. — No. 11. — P.71–78.

10. Sukhodolets V. V. Funktsiya krossingovera / V. V. Sukhodolets // Genetika. — 1986. —Vol. 22. — No. 11. — P.2551–2559.

11. Sedlovskiy A. I. Izuchenie netraditsionnykh metodov selektsii samoopylyayushchikhsya kultur / A. I. Sedlovskiy, L. N. Tyupina, V. V. Novokhatin //

Problemy teorii i prikladnoy genetiki v Kazakhstane: mater. Resp. konfer. — Alma-Ata, 1990. — P.4–5.

12. Syukov V. V. Metody podbora roditelskikh par dlya gibridizatsii u samoopylyayushchikhsya rasteniy / V. V. Syukov. — Samara, 2007. — 80 p.

13. Tsilke R. A. Problemy rekombinatsionnoy selektsii rasteniy / R. A. Tsilke. — Novosibirsk, 1989. — P.12–17.

14. Chekalin N. M. Osnovnye napravleniya selektsii zernobobovykh kultur / N. M. Chekalin // Selskokhozyaystvennaya biologiya. —1979. —Vol. 14. —

No. 6. — P.695–703.

15. Ebmeyer E. Heterosis and genetic variances and their implications for breeding improved varieties of spring beans (

Vicia faba

) / E. Ebmeyer //

Plant breed. — 1988. —Vol. 101. — No. 3. — P.200–207.

16. Habgood B. M. Estimation of genetic aiversity of selffertilising cereal cultivars basea on genotype — environment interactions / B. M. Habgood //

Euphytica. — 1977. —Vol. 26. — P.485–489.

17. Thurling N. Evaluation of parent selection methods for yield improvement of compea (

Vigna unguiculata

) / N. Thurling, M. Ratinam // Euphyti-

ca. — 1987. —Vol. 36. — No. 3. — P.913–926.

BREEDING POTENTIAL OF COMMON VETCH HYBRIDS

(VICIA SATIVA)

AS AFFECTED BY DIFFERENT METHODS FOR PARENTAL SELECTION

G. I. Ivshin, Dr. Agr. Sc.

Moscow Station for Plant Breeding

142960, Russia, the Moscow region, Serebryano-Prudskiy rayon, selo Uzunovo (village).

E-mail:

uzunovo-mss@mail.ru; G.Ivshin.G@yandex.ru

Experiments that took place in 1978-2003 showed effecƟveness of parental lines’ selecƟon of

Vicia saƟva

based on the follow-

ing principles: ecological and geographical distance, difference in adaptaƟon to contrast environments and resistance to abi-

oƟc stressors, considering the mean values. The invesƟgaƟons were conƟnued in 2004-2013 on a new plant material and un-

der different ecological condiƟons. The above menƟoned methods were proved to be efficient, some of them were modified.

Novel varieƟes

“Vera”

and

“Neposeda”

were bred by ecological-geographical method. Hybrids “

Orlovskaya-88”

×

“Uzunov-

skaya-83”, “sel. № T-28-(MSS)”

×

“Yubileynaya-110” etc.

gave progenies with posiƟve characterisƟcs at different breeding stag-

es. Contrast environment method gave line “No. О-76” exceeding the reference variant in producƟvity by 0.45 t ha

-1

or 20.1 %

on the average for two years. Using difference in suscepƟbility to abioƟc stresses resulted in effecƟve combinaƟons where un-

der favorable condiƟons female parent had high producƟvity and drought-tolerance while male parent combined good yield

capacity and resistance to excessive weƫng. Thereby beƩer adaptaƟon to contrast stress-factors of parental pairs was crucial

in obtaining leading hybrids. It is assumed that the type of exogenous stressor is not that important as the presence of stress-

resistance mechanism in parental line.

Keywords:

common vetch, plant breeding, hybridizaƟon, selecƟon of parental lines.

Электронная Научная СельскоХозяйственная Библиотека