ЭлБиб

12 / 74

INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL JOURNAL № 4 (364) / 2018
10
STATE REGULATION AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT APK
budgets of different regions, and the implementaƟon of the proposed measures contributes to the accelerated socio-economic development of the region. Discus-
sion: the North Caucasus district differs from other districts in that the enƟre natural complex, all components of the natural environment determine its economic
specializaƟon. Historically, the mountains, with their large plant, animal, water and fossil riches, spread over relaƟvely small areas, have been and conƟnue to be
increasingly resource providers to lowland civilizaƟons. More than 70% of the thermal waters of the Russian FederaƟon are located on the territory. The Caucasus
ski resorts are just a storehouse of natural aƩracƟons. Naturally, the most important of them is mount Elbrus. Conclusion: our proposed creaƟon of territories of
advanced development in the mountainous areas of the North Caucasus Federal district will further enhance its status, and in the future, its access to the world
level. Such territories in the future can be only at the first stage — not less than 12 in addiƟon to those already mastered territories, but the most important is
inclusion of all regions of the district. While maintaining the dynamics of aƩracƟng private investment by 2025, 1 ruble of public investment in the future will
account for up to 1.5 rubles of private investment.
Keywords: Russia, North Caucasian Federal district, mountain areas, status, priority development areas.
References
1. UN Habitat:The Vancouver declaration on human
settlements (1976). URL: http://
ver/vandecl. htm. Zugegriff en am 26.01.2015.
2. Volkov S., Shapovalov D., Klyushin P. Effective
management of land resources — the basis of food se-
curity in Russia. Mezhdunarodnyj selskokhozyajstvennyj
zhurnal = International agricultural journal. 2017. No. 4.
Pp. 12-15.
3. Dyakov . Priority development areas as a tool
for sustainable use of natural capital. Ekonomika i sotsi-
alnaya politika = Economy and social policy. 2017. No. 2.
Pp. 20-24.
4. Ataev Z.V. Foothill landscapes in the system of
mountain-plain territories of the North-East Caucasus.
Molodoj uchenyj = Young scientist. 2011. Vol. 1. No. 11.
Pp. 101-105.
5. Ismikhanov Z.N., Magomedbekov G.U. A study of
the current environmental, social and economic prob-
lems of sustainable development of the region: a cog-
nitive approach. Yug Rossii: ekologiya, razvitie = South
of Russia: ecology, development. 2017. Vol. 12. No. 4.
Pp. 46-56.
6. Kashina N.V.Territories of advanced development:
a new tool for attracting investments to the far East of
Russia. Ekonomika regiona = Economics of the region.
2016. Vol. 12, vol. 2. Pp. 569-585.
7. Smirnov M.A. Areas of priority development: high
risks and the necessity of active state industry policy.
Ekonomicheskaya politika = Economic policy. 2015. No. 16
(250). Pp. 58-68.
8. Fischenko K.S. Prerequisites and conditions for
creating territories of priority development. Voprosy eko-
nomiki i upravleniya = Issues of economics and manage-
ment. 2017. No. 1. Pp. 123-128.
9. Vinokurtseva E.A. About necessity of creation
of territories of priority development in Russian Fed-
eration. Molodoj uchenyj = Young scientist. 2016. No. 23.
Pp. 210-211.
10. Federal law No. 392-FZ of 3 December 2011 “On
territorial development zones in the Russian Federation”.
11. Federal law of 29.12.2014 No. 473-FZ “On terri-
tories of advancing socio-economic development in the
Russian Federation” (as amended on 13.07.2015). SZ the
Russian Federation. 2015. No. 1 (part I). St. 26.
12. Federal law No. 519-FZ of 31 December 2014“On
amendments to certain legislative acts of the Russian
Federation in connection with the adoption of the Fed-
eral law on territories of advanced social and economic
development in the Russian Federation”.
13. The Federal law from 29.11.2014 No. 382-FZ “On
amendments to parts one and two of the Tax code of the
Russian Federation”.
14. The order of the Government of the Russian
Federation of 15.04.2014 No. 309 (edition of 27.02.2016)
“About the approval of the state program of the Russian
Federation“Development of the North Caucasian Federal
district for the period till 2025”. 224 p.
15. Ataev Z.V., Bratkov V.V. The climatic features and
the temporal structure of the foothill landscapes in the
Northeastern Caucasus. European Researcher. 2011.
No. 10 (13). Pp. 1439-1444.
16. Musaev M.R., Shapovalov D.A., Shirokova V.A., Kly-
ushin P.V., Khutorova A.O., Savinova S.V. Ecological prob-
lems of agricultural land use in the North Caucasus Feder-
al district. Yug Rossii: ekologiya, razvitie = South of Russia:
ecology, development. 2016. Vol. 11. No. 3. Pp. 181-192.
17. Abdurakhmanov G.M. Uniform law on mountain
territories as the basis of sustainable development of the
North Caucasus Federal district: materials of International
scientific-practical conference, Grozny, October 12-14,
2014. Grozny: Chechen state university publishing house,
2014. Pp. 38-47.
18. The North Caucuses: the challenge of integra-
tion. International Crises Group .
European Reports. No. 220, 221, 226, 237.
19. Abdurakhmanov G.M., Budurkanova L.A., Gajra-
bekova North Caucasian Federal district needs a
unified law on mountain territories. Yug Rossii: ekologiya,
razvitie = South of Russia: ecology, development. 2015.
Vol. 10. No. 3. Pp. 24-35.
20. Benz A. Framing Modernization Interventions:
Reassessing the Role of Migration and Translocality in
Sustainable Mountain Development in Gilgit-Baltistan,
Pakistan. Mountain Research and Development, 36 (2).
2016:141-152.
21. Choenkwan S., Promkhambut A., Hayao F.
and Rambo A.T. Does Agrotourism Benefit Mountain
Farmers? A Case Study in PhuRuea District, Northeast
Thailand. Mountain Research and Development, 36(2).
2016:162-172.
22. Rogerson C.M., Rogerson J.M. Agritourism and
local economic development in South Africa Bulletin of
Geography, Socio-Economic Series. 2014. 26: 93-106.
23. Flanigan S., Blackstock K., Hunter C. Agritourism
from the perspective of providers and visitors: A typolo-
gybased study. Tourism Management 2014. 40: 394-405.
24. United Nations [UN]. 2012. Resolution adopted
by the General Assembly on 27 July 2012. Agenda Item
19. 66/288 The Future We Want: A/RES/66/288.
25. Law of the Republic of North Ossetia — Alania
of 30 December 1998 No. 30-RZ “On mountainous terri-
tories in the Republic of North Ossetia — Alania”. Adopt-
ed by resolution of the Parliament of North Ossetia —
Alania from 16.12.1998. Changes and additions: The Law
of North Ossetia — Alania from 22.05.06 No. 28-RZ.
26. Karachay-Cherkess Republic. Sustainable devel-
opment: experience, problems, prospects. Moscow: In-
stitute of sustainable development of the public cham-
ber of the Russian Federation; Center for environmental
policy of Russia, 2013. 128 p.
27. Dega N., Onishchenko V., Baychorova E.
Ekologogeografichesky monitoring of the upper seg-
ment of the Kuban River. Proceedings of the 4th Europe-
an Conference on Innovations in Technical and Natural
Sciences. “East West” Association for Advanced Studies
and Higher Education GmbH. Vienna. 2014. Pp. 138-145.
28. The law of the Kabardino-Balkar Republic of
may 16, 2012 No. 31-RZ “On the development of ski
tourism in the Kabardino-Balkar Republic” was Adopted
by the Parliament of the Kabardino-Balkar Republic
April 26, 2012.
29. The law of the Republic of Ingushetia of Febru-
ary 03, 2016 No. 1-RZ “About mountain territories of the
Republic of Ingushetia”. Adopted By the people’s Assem-
bly of the Republic of Ingushetia on January 28, 2016.
30. The resolution of the Government of the Chech-
en Republic from April 4, 2017 No. 77 on approval of
“Socio-economic development of the mountain ter-
ritories (of Vedeno, Itum-Kale, Nozhai-Yurt, Shatoi, sha-
royskogo municipal districts) of the Chechen Republic
(2017-2020 onward)”.
31. The law of the Republic of Dagestan of Decem-
ber 16, 2010 No. 72 “On mountainous territories of the
Republic of Dagestan” was Adopted by the People’s
Assembly of the Republic of Dagestan on December 9,
2010. The electronic text of the document prepared by
CJSC“Code”and verified: the official website Of the gov-
ernment of the Republic of Dagestan.
32. Resolution of the Government of the Republic
of Dagestan of November 7, 2013 No. 572. About the ap-
proval of the state program of the Republic of Dagestan
“Social and economic development of mountain territo-
ries of the Republic of Dagestan for years”.
33. Plenary session of the Mountain forum. Official
websiteofthePresidentoftheRepublicofDagestan.URL:
http://
34. Government resolution of March 16, 2018
No. 262-280 “About creating territories of priority socio-
economic development”.
About the authors:
Dmitry A. Shapovalov, doctor of technical sciences, professor, pro-rector for research and innovation, ORKID: ,
Vera A. Shirokova, doctor of geographical sciences, professor, professor at the department of soil science, ecology and natural resources of the State university
of land use planning, head of the department of the history of Earth sciences of the S.I. Vavilov institute for the history of science and technology of the Russian
academy of sciences, ORCID: ,
Pavel V. Klyushin, doctor of agricultural sciences, professor, ORCID: ,
Alla O. Khutorova, candidate of geographical sciences, associate professor, ORCID: ,
Svetlana V. Savinova, candidate of geographical sciences, associate professor,
ORCID: ,
Электронная Научная СельскоХозяйственная Библиотека