Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  290 / 854 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 290 / 854 Next Page
Page Background

et al.( 1998, Johansson and Svensson, 1999). According to our

results with mixograms and other baking quality analyses we

suggest a new index for evaluation Mixogram curve. Index

MIS is the sum:

1

. peak height in mm, 2. peak width in mm, 3.

peak width 60 mm after peak in mm multiplied by 2, 4. width

8

min. from zero multippied by 2. MIS index in our results

had better correlations to SDS test and bread volume according

to classes of HMW glutenin composition (Table 2) - Hanisova,

Horcicka, Kubanek, 2000.

T a b l e 2

Mean values of SDS, loaf volume and MIS index according

to HMW glutenin subunits - winter wheat Stupice

1993-1999

Glutenin composition Payne

score

SDS

ml

Loaf

volume

MIS

index

T ,7 + 9,5+ 10

9

68

428

233

2*,7 + 9,5+ 10

9

66

435

219

n,7 + 9,5 + 10

7

65

420

208

n,7 + 8,5+ 10

7

69

405

216

n,6 + 8,5+ 10

5

70

373

170

n,6 + 8,2+ 12

3

49

361

164

n,6 + 8,5 + 10

3

42

369

125

P 0.05

8.18

22.7

28.7

Correlation coefficients

________________SDS_______bread volume

bread volume

0.65*

MIS

0.8Г

0

.

88

The final criterion of bread making quality is experimental

bread making. Many methods are laborious and costly. In our

experiments Panasonic Automatic Bread Maker gave promising

results for baking quality evaluation. The method is practical,

easy, economical and could be used for differentiating wheat

with good bread making quality (Hanisova, Petr, Hruskova

1995).

Very similar screening system of disesase resistance

breeding is used at STUPICE for the last 25 years. We have to

combine our knowledge from different tests with artificial

infection or natural infection and seedling test (Table 3).

261

Научная электронная библиотека ЦНСХБ