Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  35 / 82 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 35 / 82 Next Page
Page Background

were dish-bowl blossoms wiih more or less exposed nectar: shallow flowers of

Filipen-

chiJo

(33.3% of the pollen loads)..

Patentilia, Gettm. Veratrum,

Brassicaceae or dense flat

inflorescences with ‘"tube" effect e. g. Asteraceae (Table 3a, Fig. 3). The pollen grains

from "bell ’

Vacemhun —

60.0% of the pollen loads and

Campanula

—40.0% of the pollen

loads as well as "gullet" —

Pediculans

(33.3% of the pollen loads), and "flag" flowers

were presented even better then those of the "dish-bowl" plants considering the

abundance if the blssom types in the area. The pollen grains o f the "bells" were adequate

to the plants flowering around but the "flag" and "gullet"' plants were presented better in

the pollen baskets rather than in the field. Even

Aconitum

and

Rhinanthus

were not

recorded in the close vicinity, which indicates wide area of foraging (Table 3).

Genttana

pollen quantity varied within species and conspecilic individuals bumblebees:

Boinbus

pratonun (n

* 9, mean = 64.4%, min = 3% max = 100%):

B. sylvctrum

(/; = 9, mean -

83.3%, min = 16.6% max ~ 99.6%):

Вambits pvrenaem (n ~

7. mean = 71.8'%. min =

3.2% max - 99.7%); etc. (Tables 7 and 8).

Gentiana asclepiadea

L.

The main pollinators were workers and to some extent males bumblebees. They

were the most effective though not the most numerous pollinators - 10.7% of all flower

visitors (Kozuharova, 2004).

Bombus agronun

and

B. hortorum

dominated (Table 1).

Nectar collectors were 94% o f all bumblebees. Pollen collecting bumblebees usually

sucked as well nectar in the same flower (75% o f the visits). In addition, bumblebees

brushed the pollen adhered on their bodies into the pollen baskets on their way between

the flowers.

The high flower constancy of bumblebees workers observed in the fields

correlated with a high percentage of

Gentiana-type

pollen found in their pollen baskets

(mean = 65,2%, min = 0% max =100%, Table 7). Their "minors” were 1-8 plant species

(Table 8). These plants were more or less abundant in the area (Table 4, 4a). These were

dish-bowl blossoms with more or less exposed nectar: shallow flowers of

Hypericum

(47.4% of the pollen loads),

Verbascum,

Apiaceae, Brassicaceae or dense flat

inflorescences with "tube” effect e. g. Asteraceae - 63,2% of the pollen loads contained

1-4 pollen types from this family, Dipsaceae - 263%, (Table 4a). The pollen grains of

Tnjblimn -

"flag” blossoms were presented quite well - 36.8% of the pollen loads, while

in the field this was not the most abundant species (Table 4). The quantity of

Gentiana

pollen varied within species and conspecific individuals bumblebees:

Bombas terresiris

(/? - 5, mean = 76.5%. mill = 11.5% max = 99%);

Bombas praiorum (n

= 4, mean -

34.8%, min = 0% max - 100% both workers foraged on

G. asclepiadea

occasionally

considering their pollen loads. (Figs. 2 and 3);

Bombas agroram (n ~

4, mean = 71.5%,

miu = 36% max = 99%);

Bombas hortorum (n

= 3, mean = 67.9%. min = 50% max ~

83%); etc. (Tables 7 and 8). The pollen loads of a queen and a worker

B. praiorum

contained

Aconiturn-type

pollen, which indicated a wide foraging perimeter, as these

plants did not bloom in the neighborhood. The presence o f

Vaccinium

and

Pedieularls -

both species out o f flower could be due to contamination in the nest as these plants were

already not in flower for at least a month.

Электронная Научная СельскоХозяйственная Библиотека