Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  87 / 90 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 87 / 90 Next Page
Page Background

The analysis of the species distribution along the three itineraries (Fig. 3)

shows the following results: 1) the number of taxa for each itinerary is nearly

the same: №1 - 224, №2 - 212 and №3 - 195; 2) altogether 68 taxa are common

for the three itineraries, these are predominantly synanthropic plants; 3) the

number of taxa common for itineraries №2 and 3 is the highest - 87, a fact that

is explained with similar habitats; the number of taxa common for itineraries №1

and 2 is lower, while this number is the lowest for itineraries №1 and 3.

250

Locality 1

Locality 2

Locality 3

Localities

Localities

Localities

Localities

1,2, 3

1, 2

2, 3

1,3

Fig. 3. Number of taxa along the selected itineraries.

The itineraries under discussion coincide with the main hiking paths and

roads in the buffer zone in the eastern part of the Nature Reserve. It is not

possible to isolate the protected area from the anthropogenic influence and the

invasion of synanthropic plants. The realistic measures to protect the natural

plant biodiversity should be orientated to diminish the negative consequences.

The largest number of synanthropic plants is related to the following

families: Asteraceae, Brassicaceae, Rosaceae, Chenopodiaceae, Fabaceae. In

the first four families the synanthropic plants are almost completely reprsented

by anthropophytes. These plants are well adapted to soils with insufficient

humus and mineral substances but rich in nitrates. Such aggressive plants

reproduce quite successfully by viable seeds and vegetatively as well, thus

capable of invading open terrains within short time ( Г о р ч а к о в с к и й ,

К о з л о в а , 1998). The most common apophytes and anthropophytes are

Deschamptia caespitosa

(L.) Beauv . ,

Achillea millefolium

gr.,

Geum urbanum

L,

Urtica dioica

L,

Aegopodiumpodagraria

L.,

Dactylisglomerata

L.,

Chenopodium

bonus-henricus

L.,

Erodium cicutarium

(L.) L’H e r.,

Geranium sanguineum

L.,

Plantago media

L.,

Plantago major

L.,

Trifolium repens

L.,

Lolium perenne

L.,

Hordeum murinum

L.,

Taraxacum officinale

W e b., etc.

T

As

preliminary analysis testifies to the high level of anthropogenic changes

in the natural floristic composition and vegetation cover in the buffer zone of

88

Электронная Научная СельскоХозяйственная Библиотека