Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  190 / 202 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 190 / 202 Next Page
Page Background

188

tance between inbred lines of maize (

Zea mays

L.). UPOV Workshop.

Versailles. 1989.

346.

Smith O.S., Smith J.S.C., Bowen S.L., Tenborg R.A., Wall S.J.

Simi-

larities among a group of elite maize inbreds as measured by pedigree,

F1 grain yield, grain yield, heterosis and RFLPs.

Theor. Appl. Genet

.

1990. 80: 833-840.

347.

Smith J.S.C., Smith O.S., Bowen S.L., Tenborg R.A., Wall S.J.

The

description and assessment of distances between inbred lines of maize.

III. A revised scheme for the testing of distinctiveness between inbred

lines utilizing DNA RFLPs.

Maydica

. 1991. 36: 213-226.

348.

Smouse P.E., Dyer R.J., Westfall R.D., Sork V.L.

Two-generation

analysis of pollen flow across a landscape. I. Male gamete heterogeneity

among females.

Evolution

. 2001. 55: 260-271.

349.

Soller M., Beckmann J.S.

Genetic polymorphism in varietal identifica-

tion and genetic improvement.

Theor. Appl. Genet

. 1983. 67: 837-843.

350.

Soller M., Brody T., Genizi A.

On the power of experimental designs

for the detection of linkage between marker loci and quantitative loci in

cross between inbreed lines.

Theor. Appl. Genet

. 1976. 47: 35-39.

351.

Spencer D., Rerie W.G., Randall P.J., Higgins T.J.V.

The regulation

of pea seed storage protein genes by sulphur stress.

Austr. J. Plant

Physiol

. 1990. 17: 355-363.

352.

Sprague G.F., Tatum L.A.

General vs. specific combining ability in

single crosses of corn.

J. Am. Soc. Agron

. 1942. 34: 923-932.

353.

Stam P., Zeven A.C.

The theoretical proportion of the donor genome in

near-isogenic lines of self-fertilizers bred by backcrossing.

Euphytica

.

1981. 30: 227-238.

354.

Stougaard J.

Genetics and genomics of root symbiosis.

Curr. Opin.

Plant Biol

. 2001. 4: 328-335.

355.

Streiff R., Ducousso A., Lexer C., Streinkellner H., Gloessl J., Kre-

mer A.

Pollen dispersal inferred from paternity analysis in mixed oak

stand of

Quercus robur

L. and

Q. petraea

(Matt.) Liebl.

Mol. Ecol

.

1999. 8: 831-841.

356.

Stromberg L.D., Dudley J.W., Rufener G.K.

Comparing conventional

early generation selection with marker assisted selection in maize.

Crop

Sci

. 1994. 34: 1221-1225.

357.

Stuber C.W.

Marker-based selection for quantitative traits.

Vortr.

Pflanzenzuchtg

. 1989. 16: 31-49.

358.

Stuber C.W.

Mapping and manipulating quantitative traits in maize.

Trends Genet

. 1995. 11: 477-481.

359.

Stuber C.W., Edwards M.D., Wendel J.F.

Molecular-marker-

facilitated investigations of QTL in maize. II. Factors influencing yield

and its component traits.

Crop Sci

. 1987. 27: 639-648.

Электронная Научная СельскоХозяйственная Библиотека