NED365343NED

153 linked molecular markers and environmental covariables. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1999. 99: 611-625 81. Culley T.M., Wolfe D. Population genetic structure of the cleistogamous plant species Viola pubescens Alton (Violaceae), as indicated by allozyme and ISSR molecular markers. Heredity. 2001. 86: 545-556 82. Damerval C., De Vienne D. Divergence morphologique et divergence moleculare: 1. Apport des margueurs proteiques. Pp. 61-80 In: Les distances génétiques. Estimations et applications. Lefort-Buson M., De Vienne D. (eds.). INRA, Paris. 1985. 181 p. 83. Delannay X., Baumann T.T., Beighley D.H., Buettner M.J., Coble H.D., Defelice M.S., Derting C.W., Diedrick T.J., Griffin J.L., Hagood E.S. et al. Yield evaluation of a glyphostae-tolerant soybean line after treatment with glyphosate. Crop Sci. 1995. 35: 1461-1467 84. Dekkers J.C.M., Hospital F. The use of molecular genetics in the improvement of agricultural populations. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2002. 3: 22-32 85. De Vienne D. Marquerurs moleculares en genetique et biotechnologies vegetales. INRA, Paris. 2002. 86. Dillmann C., Bar-Hen A., Guerin D., Charcosset A., Murigneux A. Compari- son of RFLP and morphological distances between maize Zea mays L. inbred lines. Consequences for germplasm protection purposes. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1997a. 95: 92-102 87. Dillmann C., Charcosset A., Goffnet B., Smith J.S.C., Dattee Y. Best linear unbiased estimators of the molecular genetic distance between inbred lines. In: Advances in Biometrical Genetics. Krajewski P., Kaczmarek Z. (eds.). Poznan. 1997b. pp.105-110 88. Dice L.R. Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology. 1945. 26: 297-302 89. Dhawan V. Sustainable agriculture practices for food and nutritional security. In: Plant acclimation to environmental stress. Tuteja N., Gill S.S. (eds.). Springer, New York. 2013. pp. 343-357 90. Dragavtsev V.A. Algorithms of an ecology-genetical survey of the genofond and methods of creating the varieties of crop plants for yield, resistance and quality. St.Petersburg: VIR. 2002. 91. Dwivedi S.L., Crouch J.H., Mackill D.J., Xu Y., Blair M.W., Ragot M., Upadhyaya H.D., Ortiz R. The molecularization of public sector crop breeding: Progress, problems, and prospects. Advances in Agronomy. 2007. 95: 163-318 92. Eathington S.R., Crosbie T.M., Edwards M.D., Reiter R.S., Bull J.K. Molec- ular markers in a commercial breeding program. Crop Sci. 2007. 47: S154-S163 93. Eathington S.R., Dudley J.W., Rufener G.K. Usefulness of marker-QTL asso- ciations in early generation selection. Crop Sci. 1997. 37: 1686-1693 94. Edwards M. The pipeline of a new generation of foods-In: NABC Report 22 - Promoting health by linking agriculture, food, and nutrition. North American Ag- ricultural Biotechnology Council (NABC). 2010. http://nabc.cals.cornell.edu/Publications/Reports/nabc_22/22_3_1_Edwards.pdf 95. Edwards M.D., Page N.J. Evaluation of marker-assisted selection through com- puter simulation. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1994. 88: 376-382